Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Saudi Medical Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/

Thrombophilia-related genetic variations in patients with pulmonary embolism in the main teaching hospital in Jordan.

Authors: Nathir M, Obeidat; Abdallah, Awidi; Naef A, Sulaiman; Ilham B, Abu-Khader;

Thrombophilia-related genetic variations in patients with pulmonary embolism in the main teaching hospital in Jordan.

Abstract

To study the frequency of Factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin gene mutation G20210A and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE); and to investigate whether these factors are more frequent in patients who have no obvious risk factors for venous thrombo-embolism compared to those with obvious risk factors.A case-control study conducted at Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan during the period 2005-2007. Compared 92 patients with acute PE to 99 normal subjects. All subjects were investigated for the 3 genetically related thrombophilic factors.The frequency of these factors in patients were 22/92 (23.9%) FVL, 3/92 (3.3%) Factor II (FII) and 48/92 (52.2%) methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). In the control group, FVL was 12/99 (12.1%), FII 0/99 (0%), and 53/99 (53.5%) MTHFR. There was a statistically significant difference between patients and controls for FVL (p=0.03), but no statistical significance for FII (p=0.10) and MTHFR (p=0.85). In patients with no obvious risk factors, the frequency of these factors were 8/29 (27.6%) FVL, 2/29 (6.9%) FII, and 14/29 (48.3%) for MTHFR compared to patients with obvious risk factors 14/63 (22.2%) for FVL, 1/63 (1.6%) FII, and 33/63 (52.3%) MTHFR.The FVL is statistically more frequent in patients with PE compared to the control group, and the frequency of FVL, FII, and MTHFR is not significantly higher in patients with acute PE who have no obvious risk factors compared to those with obvious risk factors.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Jordan, Factor V, Genetic Variation, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Mutation, Humans, Thrombophilia, Female, Prothrombin, Hospitals, Teaching, Pulmonary Embolism, Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2), Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold