Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Romanian Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/

Comparative analysis of microvessel density quantified through the immunohistochemistry expression of CD34 and CD105 in rectal cancer.

Authors: Dan Silviu, Goldiş; Mircea Florin, Sferdian; Cristian, Tarţă; Lazăr Octavian, Fulger; Bogdan Dan, Totolici; Carmen, Neamţu;

Comparative analysis of microvessel density quantified through the immunohistochemistry expression of CD34 and CD105 in rectal cancer.

Abstract

Endothelial cells are highlighted using a variety of endothelial markers. One of the best known markers is CD34, a surface antigen. The most used immunohistochemical marker for identification of activated endothelial cells is CD105. We chose to compare these two markers in order to evaluate angiogenesis of the rectal cancers by determining the microvessel density (MVD). Our study included 31 patients with rectal cancer between 2010-2014, who underwent rectal resection at Arad and Timisoara Counties Hospitals, Romania. We used MVD quantification by highlighting the tumor blood vessels with two different endothelial markers using the immunohistochemical protocols. The CD34 evaluation of MVD was 37 vessels/field/×200 peritumoral (PT), compared with normal rectal mucosa with 17 vessels/field/×200. Intra-tumoral (IT) MVD for CD34 positive vessels was between 7 and 120 vessels/field/×200. Average IT MVD CD105+ was 13.7 vessels/field/×200, the PT MVD CD105+ was 10 vessels/field/×200. Usually, IT MVD CD105 is smaller than PT MVD CD105, a pattern that was not respected in our study. There was a statistical significant correlation between IT MVD CD34 and PT MVD CD34 with p=0.008, also IT MVD CD34 and IT MVD CD105 with p=0.009, PT MVD CD34 with PT MVD CD105, p=0.001. PT MVD CD34 had a statistical significant correlation with T, p=0.004. IT MVD CD105 associated with T, p=0.004, and with N, p=0.004. The evaluation of both CD34-CD105 showed the role of angiogenesis in the cancer proliferation and local spread, the angiogenesis level being maintained high even in the advanced stages of the disease. There was observed a difference between the intratumoral and peritumoral MVD, the study of this difference possibly leading to a better assessment of prognosis and adjusted therapies in the future.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mucous Membrane, Antigens, CD, Rectal Neoplasms, Microvessels, Endoglin, Humans, Antigens, CD34, Receptors, Cell Surface, Immunohistochemistry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
gold