Powered by OpenAIRE graph

Tumor neocapillary density in hepatocellular carcinoma cells implanted nude mice model.

Authors: S, Patumraj; P, Yoysungnoen; P, Kachonrattanadet; P, Wirachwong;

Tumor neocapillary density in hepatocellular carcinoma cells implanted nude mice model.

Abstract

Tumor angiogenesis is an important process for several kinds of tumor, especially, during its angiogenic switch. The present study was aimed to investigate the dynamical process of tumor neocapillarization in Hepatocellular carcinoma cells implanted nude mice model. Male BALB/c nude mice (20-25 g) were used. After the implantation of a dorsal skin-fold chamber, the Hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) (30 microl of 2 x 10(6) cells) were inoculated into the upper layer of the skin within the chamber (HepG2-group), while the shammed control group (Sham-group) was received a normal saline. Intravital fluorescence videomicroscopy was performed to monitor the tumor neocapillary on days 7 and 14 post-inoculation by intravenous injection of 0.1 ml rhodamine B isothiocyanate-labeled dextran (0.5%). Based on the recorded videoimages, the tumor microvascular networks were measured using a digital image analysis. The neovascular density and configuration were represented in terms of microvascular density index (MVDI) and neovascular bifurcation ratio (BR). The MVDI levels of HepG2-group were significantly increased on day 7 and 14 compared to the age-matched Sham-group. The increase in MVDI agreed with the increase in the BR. In conclusion, our dorsal skin-fold chamber technique with intravital fluorescence videomicroscopy and digital image analysis was most useful to monitor the neovascular network for quantitatively evaluating the progression of tumor angiogenesis in terms of MVDI and BR values.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Microscopy, Video, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Staining and Labeling, Transplantation, Heterologous, Mice, Nude, Mice, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Methods, Animals, Humans, Neoplasm Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average