Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Gastroint...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/

NAT2 polymorphisms and sporadic colorectal cancer survival.

Authors: Gelu, Osian; Lucia, Procopciuc; Liviu, Vlad; Cornel, Iancu; Paul G, Cristea; Teodora, Mocan; Lucian, Mocan;

NAT2 polymorphisms and sporadic colorectal cancer survival.

Abstract

NAT2 gene polymorphisms can influence colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. We aimed to determine the extent to which NAT2 gene polymorphisms influence the survival of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer.Seventy patients with sporadic colorectal cancer that underwent surgery at the 3rd Surgical Department of Cluj-Napoca between October 2003-May 2005 were randomly selected. Correlations between NAT2*5C(T341C), NAT2*5A(C481T), NAT2*6B(G590A), NAT2*7B(G857A) polymorphisms and survival of patients with different Dukes-MAC stages of CRC were analyzed. We compared patients with a slow acetylator genotype with those having an intermediate or rapid acetylator genotype.The slow acetylator 341CC genotype is a negative prognostic factor, 20% vs. 30.8%, as compared to rapid acetylator 341TT/TC genotypes (p=0.02) in the patients diagnosed with stage C CRC. For the same stage patients, the slow acetylator 481CC was a positive prognostic factor, 33% vs. 25% (p=0.03). The slow acetylator 590AA was a negative prognostic factor for the survival of patients with stages B and C, 0% vs. 31% (p=0.02). The slow acetylator 857AA genotype was a negative prognostic factor for the patients in stage B, survival rate 0.69% vs. 50%, and positive for patients with stage C, survival rate 50% vs. 21% (p=0.0101). The rapid acetylator 341TT/TC represented a good prognostic factor, while the slow 341CC a negative one for stage D patients (p= 0.04, survival of 18.9%) HR=0.30 with 95%, CI[0.025- 0.9810].The NAT2 gene may be considered as a prognostic factor for the survival of patients with CRC.

Keywords

Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase, Romania, DNA Mutational Analysis, Acetylation, Colonoscopy, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Middle Aged, Survival Rate, Phenotype, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Prospective Studies, Registries, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research