Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Scientific Electroni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/

Evaluación de dos formulaciones de progesterona en protocolos HeatSynch en vacas Holando lactando en sistemas pastoriles

Authors: Martínez, M; Gil, J; Costa, G; Pombo, I; Peñagaricano, J; Lutz, M; Freire, A; +1 Authors

Evaluación de dos formulaciones de progesterona en protocolos HeatSynch en vacas Holando lactando en sistemas pastoriles

Abstract

Resumen Para evaluar dos formulaciones de progesterona (inyectable: MAD-4, o impregnada en un dispositivo intravaginal: DIV) incluidas en el protocolo de sincronización de celos HeatSynch, se utilizaron 377 vacas Holando en producción, primíparas y multíparas, ciclando y en anestro, ubicadas en tres tambos. El protocolo consistió en: Día 0: GnRH y administración de MAD-4 o DIV; Día 7: Prostaglandina (PG); Día 8: Benzoato de estradiol (BE); Día 9: detección de celo e IA; Día 10: Inseminación Artificial a Tiempo Fijo (IATF) a vacas que no mostraron celo. Se realizó el diagnóstico de gestación mediante ultrasonografía a 45 días del inicio de los tratamientos. Se extrajeron muestras de leche los Días -7 y 0 para determinación de actividad ovárica mediante la dosificación de progesterona. Los porcentajes de preñez a la primera inseminación fueron: 20,5% en el tambo 1, 30,8% en el tambo 2, y 43,3% en el tambo 3 (P0,01) la ciclicidad (Ciclando: 32,3%, Anestro: 35,3%; P>0,01) ni la paridad (Primíparas: 36,1%, Multíparas: 30,2%; P>0,01). Se encontró una interacción entre tambo y ciclicidad (P0.01) cyclicity (Cycling: 32.3%, Anestrus: 35.3%; P>0.01) or parity (Primiparous: 36.1%, Multiparous: 30.2%; P>0.01). An interaction was found between farm and cyclicity (P<0.05). Pregnancy rate was lower in Primiparous of farm 1 than in farms 2 and 3 (12.9% vs. 49.8% and 33.3%; P<0.05). Bases on the lack of differences between treatments it was concluded that it is possible to replace intravaginal devices with injectable progesterone, as a presentation easier to apply and that does not generate wastes of hormonal pollutants.

Keywords

anestro posparto, vacas para leche, estrus synchronization, dairy cows, progesterone, postpartum anestrus, sincronización de celos, progesterona

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green