Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Scientific Electroni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/

Comparación de diferentes formulaciones de estradiol y de progesterona en un protocolo de sincronización de celos en vacas Holando en lactancia en un sistema pastoril; perfiles hormonales y respuesta ovárica

Authors: Martínez-Barbitta, M; González-Guasque, W; Martínez-Piña, M; Cavestany, D;

Comparación de diferentes formulaciones de estradiol y de progesterona en un protocolo de sincronización de celos en vacas Holando en lactancia en un sistema pastoril; perfiles hormonales y respuesta ovárica

Abstract

Resumen El objetivo fue evaluar tres formulaciones de estradiol (E2) [5 mg de 17β (E17), 1 mg de benzoato (EB) y 1 mg de cipionato (ECP)] y dos presentaciones de la progesterona (P4) - dispositivo intravaginal (DIV) con 558 mg de P4 y 200 mg de P4 parenteral (MAD-4) - en un protocolo de sincronización de la ovulación. Se seleccionaron 30 vacas Holando en ordeñe que fueron presincronizadas con una combinación de GnRH y prostaglandina (PG) administradas con siete días de intervalo y que manifestaron celo en el mismo día; a los 10 días de éste se formaron 6 grupos (n=5 c/u): 1) DIV + EB: día 0: DIV + EB; Día 8: PG y retiro del DIV; Día 9: EB. 2) DIV + E17: día 0: DIV + E17; Día 8: PG y retiro del DIV; Día 9: E17. 3) DIV + ECP: día 0: DIV + ECP; Día 8: PG y retiro del DIV + ECP. 4) MAD-4 + EB: día 0: MAD-4 + EB; Día 8: PG; Día 9: EB. 5) MAD-4 + E17: día 0: MAD-4 + E17; Día 8: PG; Día 9: E17. 6) MAD-4 + ECP: día 0: MAD-4 + ECP; Día 8: PG + ECP. La respuesta fue evaluada por los niveles plasmáticos de E2, P4 y ecografía ovárica. Las concentraciones máximas de P4 se registraron una hora después del tratamiento (7,3±0,7 ng/mL DIV y 16,1±0,7 ng/mL MAD-4; P<0,0001); seis horas más tarde se redujeron a 5,7±0,7 ng/mL DIV y 11,2±0,7 ng/mL MAD-4 respectivamente (P<0.0001). Las concentraciones de E2 alcanzaron un máximo 4 horas después del tratamiento para grupos E17 y EB y 28 h después del tratamiento para grupos de ECP. Las concentraciones máximas fueron E17: 641,5±11,5 pg/mL, EB: 166,5±11,5 pg/mL y ECP: 45,6±10,9 pg/mL (P<0,0001). E2 volvió a los niveles iniciales 40 horas más tarde en grupos E17 y EB y 80 horas en grupos de ECP. Los diámetros foliculares en el día 8, fueron 14,9±1,4 y 14,4±1,3 mm para las vacas EB y E17 y 10,9±1,4 para los animales ECP (P<0,05). La ovulación ocurrió más temprano en los grupos EB y el porcentaje de vacas ovulando fue 88,9% en E17, 66,7% en EB y 30,0% en ECP (P<0,05). Abstract The objective was to evaluate three estradiol (E2) formulations [5 mg of 17β (E17), 1 mg of benzoate (EB) and 1 mg of cypionate (ECP)] and two presentations of progesterone (P4) - intravaginal device (DIV) with 558 mg of P4 200 mg of P4 parenteral (MAD-4) - in an ovulation synchronization protocol. Thirty lactating Holstein cows were presynchronized with a combination of GnRH and Prostaglandin (PG) given seven days apart and responding with a standing heat on the same day were selected; 10 days 6 groups were formed (n=5 each): 1) DIV+EB: Day 0: DIV + EB; Day 8: PG and DIV withdraw; Day 9: EB. 2) DIV+E17: Day 0: DIV + E17; Day 8: PG and DIV withdraw; Day 9: E17. 3) DIV+ECP: Day 0: DIV + ECP; Day 8: PG, DIV withdraw + ECP. 4) MAD-4+EB: Day 0: MAD-4 + EB; Day 8: PG; Day 9: EB. 5) MAD-4 + E17: Day 0: MAD-4 + E17; Day 8: PG; Day 9: E17. 6) MAD-4 + ECP: Day 0: MAD-4 + ECP; Day 8: PG + ECP. The response was evaluated by plasma levels of E2 and P4 and ovarian ultrasonography. The maximum average P4 concentrations were reached one hour after the treatment (7.3±0.7 ng/mL DIV and 16.1±0.7 ng/mL MAD-4; P<0.0001); six hours later were reduced to 11.2±0.7 ng/mL DIV and 5.7±0.7 ng/mL MAD-4 respectively (P<0.0001). E2 concentrations reached a maximum 4 hours after treatment for E17 and EB groups and 28 h after treatment for ECP groups. Maximum average concentrations were E17: 641.5±11.5 pg/mL, EB: 166.5±11.5 pg/mL and ECP: 45.6±10.9 pg/mL (P<0.0001). E2 returned to baseline levels 40 hours later in E17 and EB groups and 80 hours in ECP groups. The average follicular diameters at the Day 8 were 14.9±1.4 and 14.4±1.3 mm for the EB and E17 cows and 10.9±1.4 for the ECP animals (P<0.05). Ovulation occurred earlier in E17 and was 88.9% in EB, 66.7% in E17 and 30.0% to ECP (P<0.05).

Keywords

estradiol, ovulation, estrus synchronization, dairy cows, vacas lecheras, sincronización de celo, progesterone, ovulación, progesterona

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green