Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction.
Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction.
Abstract Empirical data sets of intraspecific restriction site polymorphism in Drosophila have been gathered in order to test hypotheses derived from coalescent theory. Three main ideas are tested: (1) haplotype frequency in the sample contains information on the topological position of a given haplotype in a cladogram, (2) the frequency of a haplotype is related to the number of mutational connections to other haplotypes in the cladogram and (3) geographic location can be used to infer topological positioning of haplotypes in a cladogram. These relationships can then be used to better estimate intraspecific phylogenies in two ways: (1) rooting the phylogeny and (2) resolving ambiguities in a cladogram. This information will allow one to reduce the number of alternative phylogenies and incorporate the uncertainties involved in reconstructing intraspecific phylogenies into subsequent analyses that depend heavily on the topology of the tree.
- University of Mary United States
- Washington University in St. Louis United States
Drosophila melanogaster, Polymorphism, Genetic, Haplotypes, Models, Genetic, Animals, Drosophila, Phylogeny
Drosophila melanogaster, Polymorphism, Genetic, Haplotypes, Models, Genetic, Animals, Drosophila, Phylogeny
57 Research products, page 1 of 6
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).770 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 0.1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
