Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Cell and Tissue Rese...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cell and Tissue Research
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Distribution of prolactin receptors suggests an intraductal role for prolactin in the mouse and human mammary gland, a finding supported by analysis of signaling in polarized monolayer cultures

Authors: Eric K, Ueda; KuangTzu, Huang; Virginia, Nguyen; Marco, Ferreira; Saudade, Andre; Ameae M, Walker;

Distribution of prolactin receptors suggests an intraductal role for prolactin in the mouse and human mammary gland, a finding supported by analysis of signaling in polarized monolayer cultures

Abstract

Despite the important role of prolactin (PRL) in mammary gland development and function, little is known about the distribution of the different forms of the prolactin receptor (PRLR) under various physiological circumstances. Here, the distribution of the long (LF) and the short (S3 in mouse) receptor common to both mice and rats was determined by immunofluorescence on frozen sections of virgin, pregnant and lactating mouse mammary gland. Myoepithelial cells were consistently and intensely stained for both receptors. For luminal cells at all stages (ducts and alveoli), a large proportion of PRLR staining was unexpectedly present on the apical face. In the non-lactating state, no basal staining of luminal cells was detectable. During lactation, a proportion of both receptors moved to the basolateral surface. In vitro, HC11 cells showed constitutive expression of LF but expression of S3 only upon the formation of adherent junctions. Tight junction formation was accelerated by incubation in pseudo-phosphorylated PRL, as measured by transepithelial resistance and the expression and placement of the tight junction protein, zonula occludens-1. Once an intact monolayer had formed, all LF and S3 receptors were apical (akin to the non-lactating state) and only apical application of PRL activated the Jak2-STAT5 and ERK pathways. By contrast, basolateral application of PRL resulted in a reduction in basal ERK phosphorylation, suggesting an involvement of a dual specificity protein phosphatase. Normal human breast samples also showed apical PRLRs. These results demonstrate important contextual aspects of PRL-PRLR interactions with implications for the analysis of the role of PRL in breast cancer.

Keywords

Receptors, Prolactin, Immune Sera, Blotting, Western, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Polarity, Immunohistochemistry, Models, Biological, Prolactin, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Protein Transport, Mammary Glands, Animal, Pregnancy, Animals, Humans, Lactation, Protein Isoforms, Female, Mammary Glands, Human, Cell Proliferation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%