Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Gene variation and premature ovarian failure: a meta-analysis

Authors: D. Pu; Y. Xing; Y. Gao; L. Gu; J. Wu;

Gene variation and premature ovarian failure: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Premature ovarian failure (POF) is a complex, heterogeneous disorder that is influenced by multiple genetic components. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between gene variants and susceptibility to POF.MEDLINE and CNKI were searched for studies published from inception (1950) to June 2014. Meta-analysis was performed when three or more studies reported genetic data on the same polymorphism or mutation. Additive and dominant models were analyzed using RevMan Version 5.1.The literature search yielded 575 articles, of which 59 studies on the association between POF and gene variants were identified for meta-analysis. Five genes were selected for analysis, including 10 common gene polymorphisms [BMP15 (-9C>G, 788insTCT and 852C>T), ESR1 (-351A>G and -397C>T), FMR1 CGG repeat, FSHR (919A>G and 2039A>G), INHA (-16C>T and -124A>G)] and two mutations (BMP15 538G>A and INHA 769G>A). BMP15 538G>A was found to be significantly more common in patients with POF compared with controls. No significant associations were found between the other variants of BMP15 and POF. With respect to ESR1, the accumulative results were not significant, although the findings of the individual studies were controversial. The incidence of FMR1 premutation was significantly higher in patients with POF compared with controls [odds ratio (OR) 9.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.42-15.61; pA by ethnicity; a significant association with POF was only found in the Asian subgroup (allelic frequency: OR 8.89, 95% CI 2.1-5.52; p=0.004). No significant associations were found between the other variants of INHA and POF.BMP15 538A, FMR1 premutation and INHA 769A (in Asians alone) may indicate susceptibility to POF. Further well-designed studies and larger samples are required to confirm the association between gene variants and POF.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Polymorphism, Genetic, Racial Groups, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Primary Ovarian Insufficiency, Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein, Mutation, Humans, Receptors, FSH, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Inhibins, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 15

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%