Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

A novel A/G SNP in the −615th position of the dopamine D4 receptor promoter region as a source of misgenotyping of the −616 C/G SNP

Authors: Z, Ronai; E, Szantai; R, Szmola; Z, Nemoda; A, Szekely; J, Gervai; A, Guttman; +1 Authors

A novel A/G SNP in the −615th position of the dopamine D4 receptor promoter region as a source of misgenotyping of the −616 C/G SNP

Abstract

AbstractThe polymorphic 5′ upstream region of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene containing several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has recently become a focus of association studies in psychiatric genetics. Most SNP genotyping methods are based on the two‐step procedure of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). An alternative technique is a single‐step method of allele‐specific amplification (ASA), previously introduced for genotyping the −521 C/T SNP of the DRD4 promoter region and applied here for the −616 C/G SNP. Parallel genotyping of individuals with the novel ASA method and the conventionally used Ava II RFLP showed a potential underestimation of the −616 GG genotype frequency by the conventional method. Sequencing the dubious samples clearly demonstrated a novel A/G SNP at the −615th position influencing the Ava II digestion and thus resulting in misgenotyping. To avoid this problem, we introduced the Sau96 I RFLP for the −616 C/G genotyping as this restriction enzyme is not sensitive for the −615 A/G sequence variation. Allele (−616 G = 0.48; −616 C = 0.52) and genotype (−616 GG = 0.25; −616 GC = 0.46; −616 CC = 0.29) frequencies were determined by both the novel ASA and the Sau96 I methods. The obtained genotype frequencies corresponded to the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in our healthy Caucasian sample (N = 534, P = 0.168). Using these methods, no association was found between the −616 C/G SNP and personality factors of Cloninger's temperament and character inventory (N = 153) in our population. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords

Genotype, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Receptors, Dopamine D4, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Gene Frequency, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Personality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Average
Top 10%