<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Interspecific Divergence of Transcription Networks along Lines of Genetic Variance in Drosophila: Dimensionality, Evolvability, and Constraint

pmid: 23519314
Interspecific Divergence of Transcription Networks along Lines of Genetic Variance in Drosophila: Dimensionality, Evolvability, and Constraint
Change in gene expression is a major facilitator of phenotypic evolution. Understanding the evolutionary potential of gene expression requires taking into account complex systems of regulatory networks, the structure of which could potentially bias evolutionary trajectories. We analyzed the evolutionary potential and divergence of multigene expression in three well-characterized signaling pathways in Drosophila, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MapK), the Toll, and the insulin receptor/Foxo (InR/Foxo or InR/TOR) pathways in a multivariate quantitative genetic framework. Gene expression data from a natural population of D. melanogaster were used to estimate the genetic variance-covariance matrices (G) for each network. Although most genes within each pathway exhibited significant genetic variance, the number of independent dimensions of multivariate genetic variance was fewer than the number of genes analyzed. However, for expression, the reduction in dimensionality was not as large as seen for other trait types such as morphology. We then tested whether gene expression divergence between D. melanogaster and an additional six species of the Drosophila genus was biased along the major axes of standing variation observed in D. melanogaster. In many cases, divergence was restricted to directions of phenotypic space harboring above average levels of genetic variance in D. melanogaster, indicating that genetic covariances between genes within pathways have biased interspecific divergence. We tested whether co-expression of genes in both sexes has also biased the pattern of divergence. Including cross-sex genetic covariances increased the degree to which divergence was biased along major axes of genetic variance, suggesting that the co-expression of genes in males and females can generate further constraints on divergence across the Drosophila phylogeny. In contrast to patterns seen for morphological traits in vertebrates, transcriptional constraints do not appear to break down as divergence time between species increases, instead they persist over tens of millions of years of divergence.
- University of Queensland Australia
- Uppsala University Sweden
- University of Queensland Australia
- University of Queensland Australia
Male, 570, Evolution, Multivariate constraint, 590, Genes, Insect, 1105 Ecology, Evolution, Molecular, Behavior and Systematics, 1311 Genetics, Species Specificity, Databases, Genetic, 1312 Molecular Biology, Animals, Gene Regulatory Networks, Models, Genetic, Genetic Variation, 2700 Medicine, Transcriptional covariance, Factor analytic modeling, Multivariate Analysis, Drosophila, Female, G matrix, Expression network
Male, 570, Evolution, Multivariate constraint, 590, Genes, Insect, 1105 Ecology, Evolution, Molecular, Behavior and Systematics, 1311 Genetics, Species Specificity, Databases, Genetic, 1312 Molecular Biology, Animals, Gene Regulatory Networks, Models, Genetic, Genetic Variation, 2700 Medicine, Transcriptional covariance, Factor analytic modeling, Multivariate Analysis, Drosophila, Female, G matrix, Expression network
199 Research products, page 1 of 20
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).24 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%