Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Prognostic value of p53 mutations in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: final results of a 15-year prospective study

Authors: Koroush Madani; Alan G. Casson; Hyun J. Lim; Ronghua Zhao;

Prognostic value of p53 mutations in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: final results of a 15-year prospective study

Abstract

This study evaluates the clinical significance of p53 mutations in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC).Between February 1991 and February 2006, 142 consecutive patients with EADC underwent potentially curative oesophageal resection. No patient received induction therapy. Strict clinicopathologic criteria were used to define primary EADC (Type I), excluding gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (Type II). Genomic DNA was extracted from oesophageal tumours, each with matched histologically normal oesophageal epithelium (internal control) from the resection margin. Polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify p53 exons 4-10, and mutations were characterised by direct DNA sequencing. The p53 mutations were correlated with clinicopathologic findings, p53 protein expression determined using immunohistochemistry, and outcome using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.For all patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 26.9%. Conventional predictors of reduced OS included advanced pathological tumour-node-metastasis (pTNM) stage (P3; P<0.0001). No p53 mutations were found in normal oesophageal epithelia. A total of 47% of tumours (67/142) had p53 mutations, predominantly G:C to A:T transitions at CpG dinucleotides (36/67). The p53 mutations were associated with p53 protein overexpression (P<0.0001) and poor tumour differentiation (P=0.037). Patients whose tumours had p53 mutations had significantly reduced 5-year OS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.3; P=0.03).Patterns of p53 mutations in EADC suggest endogenous molecular mechanisms. The p53 mutations are a predictor of significantly reduced postoperative survival following surgical resection of EADC, and would appear to be a clinically useful molecular prognostic biomarker.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Genes, p53, Prognosis, Esophagectomy, Treatment Outcome, Mutation, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Epidemiologic Methods, Aged, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze