Powered by OpenAIRE graph

Abstract 2422: Early features of EMT in Abcb4−/ −-cholangiocytes: A novel cellular model for testing antimetastatic drugs

Authors: Amaia Arbizu; Carmen Gil-Puig; Juan Cabello; Jon Lecanda;

Abstract 2422: Early features of EMT in Abcb4−/ −-cholangiocytes: A novel cellular model for testing antimetastatic drugs

Abstract

Abstract Discovering novel drugs for epithelial tumors remains a challenge since cellular events underlying the onset of carcinoma progression are largely unknown. We previously reported the therapeutic effects of oral 5′-methylthioadenosine in the Abcb4−/− mouse (Latasa et al, PLoS ONE 2010: e15690), a clinically relevant model of chronic liver disease leading to carcinoma development. Aiming to gain insight into malignant cellular traits, we then generated primary cultures of intrahepatic bile duct cells from this Abcb4−/− mouse model. We found that Abcb4−/−-cholangiocytes exhibit a fibroblastoid-like appearance which is accompanied by diminished expression of epithelial hallmarks (CK19), and a concomitant up-regulation of mesenchymal markers such as Snail1. The trans-epithelial-electrical-resistance analyses indicated that whereas confluent monolayers of normal cholangiocytes retained the epithelial polarity, Abcb4−/−-cholangiocytes fail to repolarize. Abcb4−/−-cholangiocytes proliferated at reduced growth rates (p<0.05), formed a higher number of colonies in soft agar (p<0.01) and were less sensitive to antiproliferative effect of TGFβ1 (p<0.05). Consistent with EMT characteristics, Abcb4−/−-cholangiocytes induced TGFβ isoforms and were more sensitive to TGFβ1-signaling. Collectively, this data suggests that Abcb4−/− cholangiocytes acquire EMT features that may be largely regulated in vivo by TGFβ1. This original bile ductular cell line of Abcb4−/−-cholangiocytes will be useful for testing compounds that may interfere with metastatic malignancy of EMT. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2422. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2422

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average