Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Annals of Vascular S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability of the FARP 2 Score to Predict Early Graft Failure after Infrainguinal Bypass

Authors: Mazlum Sahin; Helin El;

External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability of the FARP 2 Score to Predict Early Graft Failure after Infrainguinal Bypass

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of the FARP2 (female gender [F], bypass after a previous angioplasty [A], Redo bypass [R], and Pedal bypass [P2]) scoring system in predicting early graft failure (EGF) after infrainguinal bypass surgery (IBS).Charts of patients who underwent IBS between January 2014 and January 2017 in 2 tertiary academic centers were evaluated retrospectively. In follow-ups, 1 week after operation, detailed physical examination was done, Doppler ultrasonography was performed 1 month after operation, and integrity of the graft was evaluated. Calculation of FARP2 score was performed by a single surgeon (M.S.) who was well informed regarding FARP2 scoring system. The FARP2 scoring system was evaluated as following: female gender 1 point, bypass after a previous angioplasty 1 point, redo bypass 1 point, and pedal bypass 2 points.Totally, 231 patients (180 men and 51 women) were enrolled in the study. The mean FARP2 score was 0.52 ± 0.73. The graft occlusion occurred in 23 patients (10%). Presence of critical leg ischemia was lower in patients who faced early graft occlusion (P = 0.002). On the other hand, Rutherford classification score was significantly higher in patients who did not face graft occlusion (4.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.007). Moreover, unsuccessful angioplasty history and history of previous surgery were more common in that group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). None of the patients faced acute pulse loss, numbness loss, or ulcerative lesion after unsuccessful angioplasty. The mean interval between unsuccessful angioplasty and bypass was 1 ± 1.2 days in our study, which may have a role to prevent undesirable clinical consequences. The FARP2 score was 1.5 ± 1.2 and 0.4 ± 0.6 in patients who faced graft occlusion and in patients without occlusion (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis identified that critical leg scheme, presence of unsuccessful angioplasty history, and history of previous bypass operation were found as a predictive factor for EGF (P = 0.044, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003, respectively). Finally, our study demonstrated that patients with FARP2 score 3-4 have 2.88-fold increased graft occlusion risk when compared with patients with FARP2 score 1-2.Our study externally validates that the FARP2 scoring system is related with EGF after IBS. The FARP2 score may be an effective practice in prediction of EGF in patients with peripheral arterial bypass surgery.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Academic Medical Centers, Chi-Square Distribution, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Decision Support Techniques, Prosthesis Failure, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Logistic Models, Predictive Value of Tests, Multivariate Analysis, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average