Direct Evidence of a Role for Heterochromatin in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation
pmid: 8689681
Direct Evidence of a Role for Heterochromatin in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation
We have investigated the mechanism that enables achiasmate chromosomes to segregate from each other at meiosis I in D. melanogaster oocytes. Using novel cytological methods, we asked whether nonexchange chromosomes are paired prior to disjunction. Our results show that the heterochromatin of homologous chromosomes remains associated throughout prophase until metaphase I regardless of whether they undergo exchange, suggesting that homologous recognition can lead to segregation even in the absence of chiasmata. However, partner chromosomes lacking homology do not pair prior to disjunction. Furthermore, euchromatic synapsis is not maintained throughout prophase. These observations provide a physical demonstration that homologous and heterologous achiasmate segregations occur by different mechanisms and establish a role for heterochromatin in maintaining the alignment of chromosomes during meiosis.
- University of California, Davis United States
- Stanford University School of Medicine United States
- University of California, San Francisco United States
Male, X Chromosome, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), Centromere, Prophase, Chromatin, Euchromatin, Meiosis, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Heterochromatin, Mutation, Oocytes, Animals, Drosophila, Female, In Situ Hybridization
Male, X Chromosome, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), Centromere, Prophase, Chromatin, Euchromatin, Meiosis, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Heterochromatin, Mutation, Oocytes, Animals, Drosophila, Female, In Situ Hybridization
6 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).321 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
