Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Journal of Cell ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2002
Data sources: PubMed Central
The Journal of Cell Biology
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Putting a cap on reinitiation

Authors: LeBrasseur, Nicole;
Abstract

The transcription apparatus barely gets started before shutting itself down, according to Lawrence Myers (Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH), Paul Tempst (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY), and colleagues. Figure Native and recombinant capping enzymes block transcription in vitro. The authors have found that the two yeast mRNA capping enzymes, Cet1p and Ceg1p, are potent in vitro inhibitors of transcription. Cet1p, stimulated by its Ceg1p binding partner, stalled transcription by blocking reinitiation at already activated promoters. Conversely, elimination of Cet1p in vivo stimulated transcription. Although Cet1p is the first general repressor found to act at reinitiation, this step is well suited for transcription inhibition. “If 100 transcripts are made from a promoter,” says Myers, “only one is made at initiation—the remaining 99 are made by reinitiation.” A block by the capping enzyme could ensure that RNA polymerase does not make more transcripts than can be properly processed. It is still unclear how capping enzymes block reinitiation. Possibly, the interaction of Cet1p with proteins in the reinitiation scaffold may prevent further polymerase subunits from entering. The inhibition must be lifted to allow multiple rounds of transcription. Here, Myers speculates that the final step of capping (methylation, which does not occur in the in vitro system) might release repression and allow reinitiation. ▪ Reference: Myers, L., et al. 2002. Mol. Cell. 10:883–894. [PubMed]

Keywords

Research Roundup

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
bronze
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research