Substrate preference of an ABC importer corresponds to selective growth on β-(1,6)-galactosides in Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis
Substrate preference of an ABC importer corresponds to selective growth on β-(1,6)-galactosides in Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis
Bifidobacteria are exposed to substantial amounts of dietary β-galactosides. Distinctive preferences for growth on different β-galactosides are observed within Bifidobacterium members, but the basis of these preferences remains unclear. We previously described the first β-(1,6)/(1,3)-galactosidase from Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04. This enzyme is relatively promiscuous, exhibiting only 5-fold higher efficiency on the preferred β-(1,6)-galactobiose than the β-(1,4) isomer. Here, we characterize the solute-binding protein (Bal6GBP) that governs the specificity of the ABC transporter encoded by the same β-galactoside utilization locus. We observed that although Bal6GBP recognizes both β-(1,6)- and β-(1,4)-galactobiose, Bal6GBP has a 1630-fold higher selectivity for the former, reflected in dramatic differences in growth, with several hours lag on less preferred β-(1,4)- and β-(1,3)-galactobiose. Experiments performed in the presence of varying proportions of β-(1,4)/β-(1,6)-galactobioses indicated that the preferred substrate was preferentially depleted from the culture supernatant. This established that the poor growth on the nonpreferred β-(1,4) was due to inefficient uptake. We solved the structure of Bal6GBP in complex with β-(1,6)-galactobiose at 1.39 Å resolution, revealing the structural basis of this strict selectivity. Moreover, we observed a close evolutionary relationship with the human milk disaccharide lacto-N-biose-binding protein from Bifidobacterium longum, indicating that the recognition of the nonreducing galactosyl is essentially conserved, whereas the adjacent position is diversified to fit different glycosidic linkages and monosaccharide residues. These findings indicate that oligosaccharide uptake has a pivotal role in governing selectivity for distinct growth substrates and have uncovered evolutionary trajectories that shape the diversification of sugar uptake proteins within Bifidobacterium.
- Technical University of Denmark Denmark
- University of Copenhagen Denmark
- University of Copenhagen Denmark
Galactoogliosaccharides (GOS), Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Probiotic, Crystallography, X-Ray, Substrate Specificity, Evolution, Molecular, Bifidobacteria, Bacterial Proteins, Bifidobacterium animalis, Catalytic Domain, Amino Acid Sequence, Prebitoic, Binding Sites, Crystal structure, Enzyme kinetics, Galactosides, Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), Galactosidases, Actinobacteria, Human milk ogliosaccharides (HMO), Kinetics, Surface plasmon resonance (SPR), Protein evolution, ABC transport, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Microbiome, Human gut microbiota, Protein Binding
Galactoogliosaccharides (GOS), Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Probiotic, Crystallography, X-Ray, Substrate Specificity, Evolution, Molecular, Bifidobacteria, Bacterial Proteins, Bifidobacterium animalis, Catalytic Domain, Amino Acid Sequence, Prebitoic, Binding Sites, Crystal structure, Enzyme kinetics, Galactosides, Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), Galactosidases, Actinobacteria, Human milk ogliosaccharides (HMO), Kinetics, Surface plasmon resonance (SPR), Protein evolution, ABC transport, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Microbiome, Human gut microbiota, Protein Binding
17 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 1999IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 1987IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsSupplementTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsSupplementTo
- 2021IsRelatedTo
- 2019IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).23 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
