A prospective study comparing unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome
pmid: 7926135
A prospective study comparing unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome
To assess the efficacy of unilateral laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in the induction of ovulation in anti-estrogen-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).A prospective randomized study was performed to compare unilateral with bilateral ovarian diathermy.Specialist Reproductive Endocrine Unit.Ten patients with anti-estrogen-resistant PCOS.Randomization to unilateral (4 patients) or bilateral laparoscopic ovarian diathermy (6 patients).Rate and side of ovulation and change in endocrine profiles after ovarian diathermy.Unilateral ovarian diathermy resulted in ovulation from both ovaries. Fifty percent of the patients responded to diathermy and those who responded had a significantly greater fall in serum LH concentrations than those who failed to respond.The mechanism of action of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy is via a correction of disturbed ovarian-pituitary feedback. Hypersecretion of LH appears to be the most significant endocrine disturbance in these patients.
- University College London United Kingdom
Adult, Ovary, Drug Resistance, Estrogens, Luteinizing Hormone, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Electrocoagulation, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Adult, Ovary, Drug Resistance, Estrogens, Luteinizing Hormone, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Electrocoagulation, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
6 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).105 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
