Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Transplant Immunolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Transplant Immunology
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1 matching heterogeneity in ‘favourably matched’ kidney recipients

Authors: M T, Rees; C, Darke;

HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1 matching heterogeneity in ‘favourably matched’ kidney recipients

Abstract

Allocation of cadaveric donor kidneys in the UK is founded on matching for HLA-A, -B and -DR, primarily at the broad specificity level. Increasing evidence shows that matching at a higher resolution and consideration of additional loci, such as HLA-C, -DQ and -DP, improves graft outcome. The aim of this study was to clarify the typical level of split specificity HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, -DQ and allelic -DRB1 and -DQB1 mismatching in 'favourably matched' cadaveric renal transplant pairs. Two hundred and thirty-seven cadaveric donor/recipient pairs, 'favourably matched', according to United Kingdom Transplant criteria, were typed at the split specificity level for HLA-A, -B, -C and at the allele level for HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1. The level of split specificity and allele mismatching was then assessed. Overall, 66.7% of the patients had at least one HLA-C mismatch with their donors; 36.9% of those matched for HLA-B and 85.5% of those mismatched for HLA-B (P<0.0001). A broad specificity HLA-A or -B mismatch influenced the presence of an HLA-B, or HLA-A split specificity mismatch, respectively, (P<0.05) but made no significant difference to the presence of an HLA-DR split mismatch. Overall, 4.6% of the patients were mismatched for HLA-DR split specificities but 30.4% were mismatched at HLA-DQ and 50.6% had at least one HLA-DRB1 or -DQB1 allele mismatch. Considerable HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, -DQ matching heterogeneity exists even amongst 'well matched' renal transplant patient groups. Little is known about the effects of combinations of mismatched specificities on graft survival. Thus, further investigation is merited particularly for HLA-C and -DQ mismatching.

Keywords

HLA-A Antigens, Histocompatibility Testing, HLA-C Antigens, HLA-DR Antigens, Kidney Transplantation, Tissue Donors, United Kingdom, Transplantation, Isogeneic, Haplotypes, HLA Antigens, HLA-B Antigens, Transplantation Immunology, HLA-DQ Antigens, Histocompatibility, HLA-DQ beta-Chains, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous, HLA-DRB1 Chains

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average