Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://lupus.bmj.co...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-...
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions

360 The comparison between chemiluminescent immunoassay and line immunoassay for the detection of antibodies specific to sle diagnosis: a randomised, independent multi-centre clinical study in china

Authors: X Chen; C Hu;

360 The comparison between chemiluminescent immunoassay and line immunoassay for the detection of antibodies specific to sle diagnosis: a randomised, independent multi-centre clinical study in china

Abstract

Background and aims Autoantibodies to Sm, dsDNA, Nucleosome (Nuc) and Ribosome P protein (Rib-P) are highly specific to Systemic Lupus Erythematosis (SLE) diagnosis. We aimed to compare Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) platform (BioCLIA 1200) and Line ImmunoAssay (LIA) on the conformational detection of these SLE specific antibodies through a randomised, independent and multi-centre clinical study in China. Methods A total of 717 samples suffered from systemic autoimmune diseases (SLE, n=535; SjS, n=99; SSc, n=35; RA, n=48) and healthy individuals (n=94) from 6 Tier-3 hospitals from China were tested with BioCLIA 1200 (HOB Biotech Group, Suzhou, PRC) and LIA (EUROIMMUN, Luebeck, Germany). Data were used to evaluate the test agreement between these two conformational assays. Discrepant samples were also retested by ELISA (EUROIMMUN, Luebeck, Germany) and analysed with different diseases panel. Results The overall qualitative agreements between CLIA and LIA were 91.9% (confidence interval, 95% CI 90.0%–93.7%) for anti-Sm, 86.7% (95% CI 84.3%–89.0%) for anti-dsDNA, 89.1% (95% CI 87.0%–91.3%) for anti-Nuc, 89.3% (95% CI 87.7%–91.9%) for anti-Rib-P. The discrepant samples confirmed by ELISA test showed CLIA test data had a better correlation with ELISA. Conclusions The BioCLIA 1200 (a Chemiluminescent immunoassay platform) showed good clinical performance in a large multi-centre clinical study for the detection of SLE specific autoantibodies to Sm, dsDNA, Nuc and Rib-P when comparing with LIA test method. With the additional benefit of full automation, random access and quantitative measurement, BioCLIA 1200 is an alternative to the traditional LIA test for the conformational test of SLE specific antibodies.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze