Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Circulationarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Circulation
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Circulation
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Circulation
Article . 2005
versions View all 2 versions

Multivariate Assessment of Lipid Parameters as Predictors of Coronary Heart Disease Among Postmenopausal Women

Potential Implications for Clinical Guidelines
Authors: Meir J. Stampfer; Jing Ma; Nader Rifai; Gary C. Curhan; Susan E. Hankinson; Iris Shai; Eric B. Rimm; +1 Authors

Multivariate Assessment of Lipid Parameters as Predictors of Coronary Heart Disease Among Postmenopausal Women

Abstract

Background— Over the past decade, lipid measurements have been significantly improved and standardized. We evaluated the usefulness of multiple plasma lipid parameters in predicting coronary heart diseases (CHD) among women. Methods and Results— Among 32 826 women from the Nurses’ Health Study who provided blood samples at baseline, 234 CHD events were documented during 8 years of follow-up. In a nested study, these cases were matched to controls (1:2) for age, smoking, fasting status, and month of blood draw. We estimated the relative risk (RR) for each lipid parameter, adjusted for C-reactive protein, homocysteine, body mass index, family history, hypertension, diabetes, postmenopausal hormone use, physical activity, alcohol intake, and blood draw parameters. The RRs associated with an increase of ≈1 SD (mg/dL) were as follows: HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) (RR=0.6 [0.5 to 0.8], SD=17), apolipoprotein B 100 (apoB 100 ) (RR=1.7 [1.4 to 2.1], SD=32), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) (RR=1.4 [1.1 to 1.7], SD=36), total cholesterol (TC) (RR=1.4 [1.1 to 1.6], SD=40), and triglycerides (RR=1.3 [1.0 to 1.5], SD=80). Among the lipid indexes, the RRs were: apoB 100 /HDL-C (RR=1.7 [1.4 to 2.1], SD=1.0), TC/HDL-C (RR=1.6 [1.3 to 1.9], SD=1.3), LDL-C/HDL-C (RR=1.5 [1.3 to 1.9], SD=1.0), and non–HDL-C (RR=1.6 [1.3 to 1.9], SD=42 mg/dL). After simultaneous control for several lipid biomarkers, HDL-C was the primary contributor of the variation in multivariate models ( P =0.01), followed by LDL-C ( P =0.01), whereas triglycerides and apoB 100 did not contribute further information. HDL-C–related ratios were the strongest contributors to predicting CHD ( P <0.0001). Conclusions— Lower levels of HDL-C may be a key discriminator of higher CHD events among postmenopausal women. HDL-C–related ratios (such as TC/HDL-C) provide a powerful predictive tool independently of other known CHD risk factors.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Risk, Incidence, Cholesterol, HDL, Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Disease, Cholesterol, LDL, Middle Aged, Lipids, Cohort Studies, Postmenopause, C-Reactive Protein, Case-Control Studies, Apolipoprotein B-100, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Female, Homocysteine, Apolipoproteins B, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    220
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
220
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%
bronze