Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions

Native yeast and non-yeast fungal communities of Cabernet Sauvignon berries from two Washington State vineyards, and persistence in spontaneous fermentation

Authors: Xuefei, Wang; Daniel C, Schlatter; Dean A, Glawe; Charles G, Edwards; David M, Weller; Timothy C, Paulitz; John T, Abatzoglou; +1 Authors

Native yeast and non-yeast fungal communities of Cabernet Sauvignon berries from two Washington State vineyards, and persistence in spontaneous fermentation

Abstract

To address a knowledge gap about the grape berry mycobiome from Washington State vineyards, next-generation sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1) was used to identify native yeast and fungal species on berries of cultivar 'Cabernet Sauvignon' from two vineyards at veraison and harvest in 2015 and 2016. Four hundred fifty-six different yeast amplicon sequence variants (ASV), representing 184 distinct taxa, and 2467 non-yeast fungal ASV (791 distinct taxa) were identified in this study. A set of 50 recurrent yeast taxa, including Phaeococcomyces, Vishniacozyma and Metschnikowia, were found at both locations and sampling years. These yeast species were monitored from the vineyard into laboratory-scale spontaneous fermentations. Taxa assignable to Metschnikowia and Saccharomyces persisted during fermentation, whereas Curvibasidium, which also has possible impact on biocontrol and wine quality, did not. Sulfite generally reduced yeast diversity and richness, but its effect on the abundance of specific yeasts during fermentation was negligible. Among the 106 recurring non-yeast fungal taxa, Alternaria, Cladosporium and Ulocladium were especially abundant in the vineyard. Vineyard location was the primary factor that accounted for the variation among both communities, followed by year and berry developmental stage. The Washington mycobiomes were compared to those from other parts of the world. Sixteen recurrent yeast species appeared to be unique to Washington State vineyards. This subset also contained a higher proportion of species associated with cold and extreme environments, relative to other localities. Certain yeast and non-yeast fungal species known to suppress diseases or modify wine sensory properties were present in Washington vineyards, and likely have consequences to vineyard health and wine quality.

Keywords

Washington, Farms, Basidiomycota, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Wine, Ascomycota, Yeast, Dried, Fruit, Yeasts, Fermentation, DNA, Intergenic, Vitis, Mycobiome

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
hybrid