Assessing the effect of forcefield parameter sets on the accuracy of relative binding free energy calculations
Assessing the effect of forcefield parameter sets on the accuracy of relative binding free energy calculations
Software for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity can be a key enabling tool for small molecule drug discovery. Free energy perturbation (FEP) is a computational technique that can be used to compute binding affinity differences between molecules in a congeneric series. It has shown promise in reliably generating accurate predictions and is now widely used in the pharmaceutical industry. However, the high computational cost and use of commercial software, together with the technical challenges to setup, run, and analyze the simulations, limits the usage of FEP. Here, we use an automated FEP workflow which uses the open-source OpenMM package. To enable effective application of FEP, we compared the performance of different water models, partial charge assignments, and AMBER protein forcefields in eight benchmark test cases previously assembled for FEP validation studies.
- Cornell University United States
- Tri-Institutional Therapeutics Discovery Institute United States
validation, relative binding free energy, QH301-705.5, forcefield, Molecular Biosciences, free energy perturbation (FEP), Biology (General), OpenMM
validation, relative binding free energy, QH301-705.5, forcefield, Molecular Biosciences, free energy perturbation (FEP), Biology (General), OpenMM
8 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2007IsRelatedTo
- 2006IsRelatedTo
- IsRelatedTo
- IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).11 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
