Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The FASEB Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The FASEB Journal
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Cytokine therapy prevents left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction after myocardial infarction through neovascularization

Authors: Masashi, Ohtsuka; Hiroyuki, Takano; Yunzeng, Zou; Haruhiro, Toko; Hiroshi, Akazawa; Yingjie, Qin; Masashi, Suzuki; +3 Authors

Cytokine therapy prevents left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction after myocardial infarction through neovascularization

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pretreatment with a combination of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF) has been reported to attenuate left ventricular (LV) remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (MI). We here examined whether the cytokine treatment started after MI has also beneficial effects. Anterior MI was created in the recipient mice whose bone marrow had been replaced with that of transgenic mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP). We categorized mice into five groups according to the following treatment: 1) saline; 2) administration of G‐CSF and SCF from 5 days before MI through 3 days after; 3) administration of G‐CSF and SCF for 5 days after MI; 4) administration of G‐CSF alone for 5 days after MI; 5) administration of SCF alone for 5 days after MI. All the three treatment groups with G‐CSF showed less LV remodeling and improved cardiac function and survival rate after MI. The number of capillaries, which express GFP, was increased and the number of apoptotic cells was decreased in the border area of all the treatment groups with G‐CSF. Even if the cytokine treatment is started after MI, it could prevent LV remodeling and dysfunction after MI—at least in part—through an increase in neovascularization and a decrease in apoptosis in the border area.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Microcirculation, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Hemodynamics, Myocardial Infarction, Apoptosis, Bone Marrow Cells, Drug Synergism, Drug Administration Schedule, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Luminescent Proteins, Mice, Cell Movement, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Animals, Cell Lineage, Drug Therapy, Combination, Bone Marrow Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    189
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
189
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%