Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Molecular and Cellul...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions

Comparison of murine and human estrogen sulfotransferase inhibition in vitro and in silico—Implications for differences in activity, subunit dimerization and substrate inhibition

Authors: Stjernschantz, E.M.; Reinen, J.; Meinl, W.; George, B.J.; Glatt, H.; Vermeulen, N.P.E.; Oostenbrink, C.;

Comparison of murine and human estrogen sulfotransferase inhibition in vitro and in silico—Implications for differences in activity, subunit dimerization and substrate inhibition

Abstract

It is well established that various endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) can inhibit human estrogen sulfotransferase (SULT1E1). In this study, we investigate murine SULT1E1 inhibition in vitro and in silico and compare this to data for the human enzyme. 34 potential EDCs were screened for their ability to inhibit both murine and human SULT1E1 and IC(50) values were determined for 14 of the inhibitory EDCs. Only estrone, dienestrol and enterolactone showed significant differences in affinity between the human and murine SULT1E1. Extensive molecular modelling was performed using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. During the MD simulations the ligands moved away from the catalytically active position, something which was not observed when simulating the unit cell of the crystal structure. This finding suggests that catalytically inactive binding modes, other than the one observed in the crystal structures, are possible in SULT1E1. The ligands stayed longer in the catalytically active position in mSULT1E1, which is likely a result of simultaneous hydrogen bond formation on both sides of the binding pocket, which does not seem to be possible in hSULT1E1. The ligands in the human protein moved to a sub-pocket near the entrance of the active site, which offers hydrogen bond formation possibilities with Asp22 and Lys85 as well as favourable hydrophobic interactions. The ligands moved more randomly in mSULT1E1. These observations offer a possible explanation for the substrate inhibition only observed in hSULT1E1.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Time Factors, Estradiol, Computational Biology, Reproducibility of Results, Hydrogen Bonding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Ligands, Substrate Specificity, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Mice, Protein Subunits, Catalytic Domain, Animals, Humans, Histidine, Protein Multimerization, Sulfotransferases, Protein Structure, Quaternary, Enzyme Assays

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Average
Top 10%
bronze