Transcriptome analysis of the murine forelimb and hindlimb autopod
doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20514
pmid: 16059910
Transcriptome analysis of the murine forelimb and hindlimb autopod
AbstractTo gain insight into the coordination of gene expression profiles during forelimb and hindlimb differentiation, a transcriptome analysis of mouse embryonic autopod tissues was performed using Affymetrix Murine Gene Chips (MOE‐430). Forty‐four transcripts with expression differences higher than 2‐fold (T test, P ≤0.05) were detected between forelimb and hindlimb tissues including 38 new transcripts such as Rdh10, Frzb, Tbx18, and Hip that exhibit differential limb expression. A comparison of gene expression profiles in the forelimb, hindlimb, and brain revealed 24 limb‐signature genes whose expression was significantly enriched in limb autopod versus brain tissue (fold change >2, P ≤ 0.05). Interestingly, the genes exhibiting enrichment in the developing autopod also segregated into significant fore‐ and hindlimb‐specific clusters (P ≤ 0.05) suggesting that by E 12.5, unique gene combinations are being used during the differentiation of each autopod type. Developmental Dynamics 234:74–89, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
- Oregon Health & Science University United States
- Shriners Hospitals for Children - Portland United States
- Shriners Hospitals for Children United States
Time Factors, Gene Expression Profiling, Brain, Cell Differentiation, Tretinoin, Hindlimb, Mice, Forelimb, Animals, RNA, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Time Factors, Gene Expression Profiling, Brain, Cell Differentiation, Tretinoin, Hindlimb, Mice, Forelimb, Animals, RNA, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
68 Research products, page 1 of 7
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).40 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
