Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of American ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Combined resection-recession in true divergence excess sensory exotropia

Authors: Karthika, Bhaskaran; Adarsh Kumar, Shashni; Pradeep, Sharma; Rohit, Saxena; Swati, Phuljhele;

Combined resection-recession in true divergence excess sensory exotropia

Abstract

To assess the effect of combined resection and recession on the same lateral rectus muscle in patients with true divergence excess sensory exotropia.Patients were divided into two groups. One group of patients underwent combined resection-recession of the lateral rectus muscle in one eye (LR group); the other group, with exodeviation of >40Δ for distance underwent additional ipsilateral medial rectus resection (LR + MR group). Postoperative measurements were taken at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months.Eleven patients were included in the study (mean age, 23.5 ± 6.7 years): 7 in the LR group and 4 in the LR + MR group. For the LR group, mean preoperative deviation was 35.7Δ ± 3.5Δ at distance and 16.3Δ ± 3.9Δ at near. The mean near-distance disparity (NDD) was 11.4Δ ± 2.7Δ. The mean lateral rectus recession was 8.6 ± 1.1 mm: the mean resection, 4.3 ± 0.5 mm. At 3 months, mean deviation at distance was 8.3Δ ± 2.1Δ; at near, 3.1Δ ± 1.6Δ (P = 0.01). The NDD was 5.7Δ ± 2.7Δ (P = 0.01). For the LR + MR group, mean preoperative deviations at distance was 65.0Δ ± 12.9Δ; at near, 35.0Δ ± 12.2Δ. The mean NDD was 30.0Δ ± 4.0Δ. Mean lateral rectus recession was 9.5 ± 1.8 mm; the mean resection, 4.8 ± 0.8 mm. The mean medial rectus resection was 5.5 ± 0.6 mm. At 3 months, mean deviation at distance was 8.3Δ ± 2.1Δ; at near, 3.1Δ ± 1.6Δ (P = 0.06). The NDD was 5.7Δ ± 2.7Δ (P = 0.06).In our study combined resection and recession of the same lateral rectus muscle in patients with divergence excess sensory exotropia significantly reduced the NDD, with no adverse outcomes.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Vision, Binocular, Vision Disparity, Adolescent, Accommodation, Ocular, Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Oculomotor Muscles, Exotropia, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Average