Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Arthritis Care & Res...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Arthritis Care & Research
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Anaerobic‐to‐aerobic power ratio in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Authors: Marco, van Brussel; Lieke, van Doren; Brian W, Timmons; Joyce, Obeid; Janjaap, van der Net; Paul J M, Helders; Tim, Takken;

Anaerobic‐to‐aerobic power ratio in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo examine the anaerobic‐to‐aerobic power ratio in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) compared with healthy peers.MethodsSixty‐two patients with JIA (mean ± SD age 11.9 ± 2.1 years, range 7.2–15.9 years) with varying severity of disease and 50 healthy children (mean ± SD age 12.1 ± 2.1, range 8.4–15.9 years) participated in this study. Anaerobic power was measured using the Wingate Anaerobic Exercise Test. Aerobic power was measured using a cardiopulmonary exercise test. The power ratio was calculated as the ratio between the anaerobic mechanical power and aerobic mechanical power in watts.ResultsMean ± SD anaerobic‐to‐aerobic power ratio and peak anaerobic‐to‐aerobic ratios in children with JIA were 1.98 ± 0.51 and 3.28 ± 1.15, respectively. Compared with healthy children these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.52 and P = 0.99, respectively). The differences in these ratios were not statistically significant when corrected for age, height, and body mass. Statistical analyses showed no significant difference between disease‐onset types of JIA for mean anaerobic‐to‐aerobic power ratio and peak anaerobic‐to‐aerobic ratio, respectively. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the development of the power ratios between children with JIA and healthy controls, or between girls and boys.ConclusionThis cross‐sectional study suggests that the development of the anaerobic‐to‐aerobic power ratio is not statistically different in children with JIA compared with healthy peers. Exercise training of the anaerobic capacity through interval training, along with aerobic exercise training, seems warranted in the exercise therapy programs of children with JIA.

Keywords

Male, Exercise Tolerance, Adolescent, Health Status, Physical Exertion, Severity of Illness Index, Arthritis, Juvenile, Body Mass Index, Oxygen Consumption, Surveys and Questionnaires, Activities of Daily Living, Exercise Test, Humans, Female, Joints, Muscle Strength, Child, Exercise

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%