Tri-Clustering Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity Identifies Significant Schizophrenia Effects Across Multiple States in Distinct Subgroups of Individuals
Tri-Clustering Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity Identifies Significant Schizophrenia Effects Across Multiple States in Distinct Subgroups of Individuals
Background: Brain imaging data collected from individuals are highly complex with unique variation; however, such variation is typically ignored in approaches that focus on group averages or even supervised prediction. State-of-the-art methods for analyzing dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) subdivide the entire time course into several (possibly overlapping) connectivity states (i.e., sliding window clusters). However, such an approach does not factor in the homogeneity of underlying data and may result in a less meaningful subgrouping of the data set. Methods: Dynamic-N-way tri-clustering (dNTiC) incorporates a homogeneity benchmark to approximate clusters that provide a more "apples-to-apples" comparison between groups within analogous subsets of time-space and subjects. dNTiC sorts the dFNC states by maximizing similarity across individuals and minimizing variance among the pairs of components within a state. Results: Resulting tri-clusters show significant differences between schizophrenia (SZ) and healthy control (HC) in distinct brain regions. Compared with HC subjects, SZ show hypoconnectivity (low positive) among subcortical, default mode, cognitive control, but hyperconnectivity (high positive) between sensory networks in most tri-clusters. In tri-cluster 3, HC subjects show significantly stronger connectivity among sensory networks and anticorrelation between subcortical and sensory networks than SZ. Results also provide a statistically significant difference in SZ and HC subject's reoccurrence time for two distinct dFNC states. Conclusions: Outcomes emphasize the utility of the proposed method for characterizing and leveraging variance within high-dimensional data to enhance the interpretability and sensitivity of measurements in studying a heterogeneous disorder such as SZ and unconstrained experimental conditions as resting functional magnetic resonance imaging. Impact statement The current methods for analyzing dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) run k-means on a collection of dFNC windows, and each window includes all the pairs of independent component analysis networks. As such, it depicts a short-time connectivity pattern of the entire brain, and the k-means clusters fixed-length signatures that have an extent throughout the neural system. Consequently, there is a chance of missing connectivity signatures that span across a smaller subset of pairs. Dynamic-N-way tri-clustering further sorts the dFNC states by maximizing similarity across individuals, minimizing variance among the pairs of components within a state, and reporting more complex and transient patterns.
- Yale University United States
- University of Iowa United States
- Georgia Institute of Technology United States
- University of Minnesota United States
- University of California, Los Angeles United States
dynamic functional network connectivity, Brain Mapping, Biological Psychology, Neurosciences, Brain, Serious Mental Illness, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Brain Disorders, schizophrenia, Mental Health, Clinical Research, Schizophrenia, Psychology, Biomedical Imaging, Biological psychology, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Mental health, ICA, dFNC states, resting-state fMRI, tri-clustering
dynamic functional network connectivity, Brain Mapping, Biological Psychology, Neurosciences, Brain, Serious Mental Illness, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Brain Disorders, schizophrenia, Mental Health, Clinical Research, Schizophrenia, Psychology, Biomedical Imaging, Biological psychology, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Mental health, ICA, dFNC states, resting-state fMRI, tri-clustering
10 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2004IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2006IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).11 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
