Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics
pmid: 34650268
Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics
Single-molecule spatial transcriptomics protocols based on in situ sequencing or multiplexed RNA fluorescent hybridization can reveal detailed tissue organization. However, distinguishing the boundaries of individual cells in such data is challenging and can hamper downstream analysis. Current methods generally approximate cells positions using nuclei stains. We describe a segmentation method, Baysor, that optimizes two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) cell boundaries considering joint likelihood of transcriptional composition and cell morphology. While Baysor can take into account segmentation based on co-stains, it can also perform segmentation based on the detected transcripts alone. To evaluate performance, we extend multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) to incorporate immunostaining of cell boundaries. Using this and other benchmarks, we show that Baysor segmentation can, in some cases, nearly double the number of cells compared to existing tools while reducing segmentation artifacts. We demonstrate that Baysor performs well on data acquired using five different protocols, making it a useful general tool for analysis of imaging-based spatial transcriptomics.
- University of Copenhagen Denmark
- University of Copenhagen Denmark
- Boston Children's Hospital United States
- Harvard University United States
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA United States
Gene Expression Profiling, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Gene Expression Profiling, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
6 Research products, page 1 of 1
- IsRelatedTo
- IsRelatedTo
- IsRelatedTo
- IsRelatedTo
- IsRelatedTo
- IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).293 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
