Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Molecular Medicine R...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Molecular Medicine Reports
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Association of paraoxonase gene polymorphisms with diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy

Authors: Jun, Wang; Ming Ming, Yang; Shi Song, Rong; Tsz Kin, Ng; Yan Bo, Li; Xiao Min, Liu;

Association of paraoxonase gene polymorphisms with diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy

Abstract

Emerging reports have revealed a potential association of paraoxonase (PON) gene polymorphisms with diabetic nephropathy (DN) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, the identification of susceptible genes and the quantification of associated risks are elusive owing to a lack of reproducibility. Therefore, a meta‑analysis was conducted in the present study to improve the understanding of the effect of PON1 and PON2 on DN and DR. A total of 10 articles, involving 2,877 patients and 3,246 controls met the inclusion criteria. Functional variants (n=4) were evaluated, including rs662 (p.Q192R) and rs854560 (p.L55M) in PON1; and rs7493 (p.S311C) and rs12026 (p.A148G) in PON2. Overall, PON1‑L55M was found to be significantly associated with DR in all the genetic models: allele [odds ratio (OR)=2.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.91‑3.07]; dominant (OR=5.76; 95% CI, 3.14‑10.55), homozygote (OR=10.53; 95% CI, 5.59‑19.86), heterozygote (OR=3.62; 95% CI, 1.94‑6.74), and recessive (OR=3.56; 95% CI, 2.61‑4.86), with no evidence of between‑study heterogeneity. However, such associations were not detected in DN and the other three polymorphisms did not show any associations with DN or DR. The current meta‑analysis highlighted results for the risk of association of PON1‑55L with DR. The results also indicated that PON2 gene polymorphisms, as well as PON1‑Q192R, may not confer major genetic risk to DN or DR. Additional studies are required to enrich the understanding of PON genes, particularly for its functional role in DR.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diabetic Retinopathy, Aryldialkylphosphatase, Humans, Diabetic Nephropathies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genetic Association Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
bronze