Comparing safety and efficacy of first‐line irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine combinations in elderly versus nonelderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
doi: 10.1002/cncr.24305
pmid: 19382200
Comparing safety and efficacy of first‐line irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine combinations in elderly versus nonelderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
AbstractBACKGROUND:Irinotecan‐based chemotherapy regimens are 1 option for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The authors report the safety and efficacy of such regimens in elderly patients using a large phase III trial (bolus, infusional, or capecitabine with camptostar‐celecoxib [BICC‐C]) cohort.METHODS:In period 1, 430 previously untreated patients with mCRC were randomized in a 3‐by‐2 design to receive irinotecan plus infusional 5‐fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI), irinotecan plus bolus 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (mIFL), and irinotecan plus oral capecitabine (CapeIRI). In period 2, an additional 117 patients were randomized to receive FOLFIRI or mIFL and bevacizumab. In both periods patients were also randomized to a double‐blind treatment with celecoxib or placebo. A secondary analysis was conducted examining the safety and efficacy of these regimens in elderly (age >70 years) versus nonelderly (age ≤70 years) patients.RESULTS:In period 1, 19.5% of patients were elderly, compared with 24.8% in period 2. Rates of grade 3 and higher toxicity did not differ significantly between age groups in either period by treatment arm, with the exception of asthenia in the FOLFIRI and CapeIRI arms (P= .05 andP= .03, respectively) and dehydration in the CapeIRI arm in period 1 (P= .02). Overall progression‐free survival for FOLFIRI in both periods was not statistically different by age. Objective responses and overall survival did not differ by patient age within treatment arms and periods.CONCLUSIONS:Irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine combinations are well tolerated in the elderly population, with similar efficacy to that found in nonelderly patients in first‐line mCRC. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
- Harvard University United States
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center United States
- Georgetown University United States
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute United States
- Pfizer (United States) United States
Male, Sulfonamides, Age Factors, Leucovorin, Administration, Oral, Irinotecan, Deoxycytidine, Survival Rate, Celecoxib, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Pyrazoles, Camptothecin, Female, Fluorouracil, Neoplasm Metastasis, Colorectal Neoplasms, Infusions, Intravenous, Capecitabine, Aged
Male, Sulfonamides, Age Factors, Leucovorin, Administration, Oral, Irinotecan, Deoxycytidine, Survival Rate, Celecoxib, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Pyrazoles, Camptothecin, Female, Fluorouracil, Neoplasm Metastasis, Colorectal Neoplasms, Infusions, Intravenous, Capecitabine, Aged
5 Research products, page 1 of 1
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).61 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
