Screening 500 unselected neurofibromatosis 1 patients for deletions of the NF1 gene
doi: 10.1002/humu.10299
pmid: 14722914
Screening 500 unselected neurofibromatosis 1 patients for deletions of the NF1 gene
A total of 500 unselected unrelated neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) patients were screened for deletions of the NF1 gene. After excluding 67 patients with known intragenic NF1 mutations, the remaining 433 were genotyped using six intragenic and one distal microsatellite marker for the NF1 gene. A total of 28 patients were hemi- or homozygous for all seven markers and were thus considered as candidates for NF1 deletion with a calculated probability of 99.99%. Metaphase or interphase cells were available from 23 of these 28 individuals for molecular cytogenetics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed an NF1 deletion in 22 (96%) of the 23 patients. Thus, a constitutional deletion of the NF1 gene is responsible for the disease phenotype in at least 4.4% of the 500 unselected NF1 patients. Genotyping using multiple microsatellite markers may provide a simple, inexpensive, and efficient strategy for screening deletions of the NF1 gene, and can as well be applied for other large genes.
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Germany
- University of Ulm Germany
- LMU Klinikum Germany
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Germany
Male, Neurofibromatosis 1, Neurofibromin 1, Genes, Neurofibromatosis 1, Humans, Female, Genetic Testing, Sex Distribution, Gene Deletion
Male, Neurofibromatosis 1, Neurofibromin 1, Genes, Neurofibromatosis 1, Humans, Female, Genetic Testing, Sex Distribution, Gene Deletion
12 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).159 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
