Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Acta Histochemicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Acta Histochemica
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Both FOXP1 and p65 expression are adverse risk factors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A retrospective study in China

Authors: Cheng-Ru, Hu; Jing-Hua, Wang; Rui, Wang; Qian, Sun; Long-Bang, Chen;

Both FOXP1 and p65 expression are adverse risk factors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A retrospective study in China

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of FOXP1 and p65 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immunohistochemistry was performed to determine the expression of FOXP1 and p65 protein in 92 DLBCL tissues and analyze their correlations with clinicopathological features or prognosis of patients. The survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazards model. Results showed that positive FOXP1 expression was detected in 68 (73.9%) cases and positive p65 expression was detected in 56 (60.9%) cases. There were 46 (50.0%) co-expression of FOXP1 and p65 protein in all cases, a positive correlation between the expression of FOXP1 and p65 was noted (r=0.234, p=0.025). The status of FOXP1 was correlated with patient's age, worse performance status score, higher lactate dehydrogenase levels and International Prognostic Index (IPI) factor score. The status of p65 was correlated with patient's age, B symptom and higher IPI factor scores. Both FOXP1 and p65 protein expression were associated with the non-GCB phenotype (p=0.001 or 0.000). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that both FOXP1 and p65 expression were associated with poor survival of patients. Meanwhile, FOXP1+/p65+ subgroup had the worst PFS (p=0.012) and OS (p=0.030), whereas the FOXP1-/p65- subgroup had the best prognosis. Thus, immunohistochemical assessment of both FOXP1 and p65 status in DLBCL tissues may be a valuable approach for predicting the survival of DLBCL patients.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, China, Time Factors, Adolescent, Gene Expression Profiling, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Immunohistochemistry, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Repressor Proteins, Phenotype, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Average
Top 10%