Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes as risk factors for spina bifida and orofacial clefts
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30713
pmid: 15887293
Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes as risk factors for spina bifida and orofacial clefts
AbstractRepairing DNA damage is critical during embryogenesis because development involves sensitive periods of cell proliferation, and abnormal cell growth or death can result in malformations. Knockout mouse experiments have demonstrated that disruption of DNA repair genes results in embryolethality and structural defects. Studies using mid‐organogenesis rat embryos showed that DNA repair genes were variably expressed. It is hypothesized that polymorphisms that alter the functionality of DNA repair enzymes may modify the risk of malformations. We conducted a case‐control analysis to investigate the relationship between DNA repair gene polymorphisms and the risk of spina bifida and oral clefts. Newborn screening blood spot DNA was obtained for 250 cases (125 spina bifida, 125 oral clefts) identified by the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, and 350 non‐malformation controls identified from birth records. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms of five DNA repair genes representing three distinct repair pathways were interrogated including: XRCC1 (Arg399Gln), APE1 (Asp148Glu), XRCC3 (Thr241Met), hOGG1(Ser326Cys), XPD (Asp312Asn, Lys751Gln). Elevated or decreased odds ratios (OR, adjusted for race/ethnicity) for spina bifida were found for genotypes containing at least one copy of the variant allele for XPD [751Gln, OR = 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–2.50] and APE 148 (OR = 0.58; CI = 0.37–0.90). A decreased risk of oral clefts was found for XRCC3 (OR = 0.62; CI = 0.39–0.99) and hOGG1 (326 Cys/Cys, OR = 0.22; CI = 0.06–0.78). This study suggested that polymorphisms of DNA repair genes, representing different major repair pathways, may affect risk of two major birth defects. Future, larger studies, examining additional repair genes, birth defects, and interaction with exposures are recommended. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
- The University of Texas System United States
- University of North Carolina System United States
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
- Texas A&M University System United States
- March of Dimes United States
Polymorphism, Genetic, DNA Repair, Genotype, Cleft Lip, DNA Helicases, Infant, Newborn, Mutation, Missense, Linkage Disequilibrium, DNA Glycosylases, Cleft Palate, DNA-Binding Proteins, Neonatal Screening, Gene Frequency, Case-Control Studies, DNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) Lyase, Odds Ratio, Humans, Genetic Testing, Mouth Abnormalities, Alleles
Polymorphism, Genetic, DNA Repair, Genotype, Cleft Lip, DNA Helicases, Infant, Newborn, Mutation, Missense, Linkage Disequilibrium, DNA Glycosylases, Cleft Palate, DNA-Binding Proteins, Neonatal Screening, Gene Frequency, Case-Control Studies, DNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) Lyase, Odds Ratio, Humans, Genetic Testing, Mouth Abnormalities, Alleles
34 Research products, page 1 of 4
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).38 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
