An algorithm for family screening for coeliac disease
An algorithm for family screening for coeliac disease
To assess the level of undiagnosed coeliac disease (CD) in relatives of patients affected by the condition.We collected blood from 914 relatives of probands. We screened these individuals by ELISA for IgA and IgG tTG antibodies, confirming any positive IgA tTG results with an IgA EMA and looked for evidence of IgA deficiency in those who were IgG tTG positive alone, and performed IgG1 EMA in these individuals. We undertook HLA typing where positive screening was found, and this confirmed a strong prevalence of HLA-DQ2 in the coeliac population. Follow-up small intestinal biopsy was undertaken in cases with positive serological screening, wherever possible.Use of this serological screening algorithm revealed a prevalence of undiagnosed CD in 5%-6% of first degree relatives of probands.Our data suggests that first degree relatives of individuals with CD should be screened for this condition.
- Kings College London, University of London United Kingdom
- King's College London United Kingdom
Adult, Male, Transglutaminases, Biopsy, 610, Middle Aged, Immunoglobulin A, Pedigree, Celiac Disease, HLA-DQ Antigens, Immunoglobulin G, 616, Intestine, Small, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Genetic Testing, Algorithms
Adult, Male, Transglutaminases, Biopsy, 610, Middle Aged, Immunoglobulin A, Pedigree, Celiac Disease, HLA-DQ Antigens, Immunoglobulin G, 616, Intestine, Small, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Genetic Testing, Algorithms
999 Research products, page 1 of 100
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).17 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
