Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Zootaxaarrow_drop_down
Zootaxa
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Zootaxa
Article . 2019
ZENODO
Article . 2019
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2019
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 4 versions

Comparative morphology and taxonomy of the tiger moth genus Epanycles Butler (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae, Arctiini, Ctenuchina), with notes on related genera

Authors: Araujo, Elias C.; Pinheiro, Lívia R.; Duarte, Marcelo;

Comparative morphology and taxonomy of the tiger moth genus Epanycles Butler (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae, Arctiini, Ctenuchina), with notes on related genera

Abstract

We studied the Neotropical genera Epanycles Butler, Sciopsyche Butler and Episcepsis Butler. We investigated the delimitation of Epanycles, which at the beginning of this work was monotypic, but had a history of other species placed in it, all of which are currently placed in genera to which they do not belong. Indeed, we found Epanycles to include only its type species, Euchromia imperialis Walker, here redescribed based on external and genitalic characters of both sexes from specimens covering most of its known geographical distribution. Our investigation included detailed studies of the species previously placed in Epanycles (Hyaleucerea gigantea (Druce) and Eucereon obscurum (Möschler)), and of species belonging to genera putatively closely related to it: Sciopsyche tropica (Walker), Episcepsis venata Butler, Episcepsis endodasia Hampson and Episcepsis luctuosa (Möschler). The characters separating all these taxa from Epanycles are discussed, and a mistake in the publication of Episcepsis atlantica Pinheiro & Araujo Jr. is corrected. The habitus and genitalia of the species herein treated are illustrated. 

Keywords

Male, Insecta, Arthropoda, Biodiversity, Moths, Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Animalia, Animals, Female, Genitalia, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
  • 4
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
visibility
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4