Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Occupational and Env...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions

Patient handling-related MSDs in hospital workers: analyses of 7 years Workers' Compensation claims data

Authors: H. Kim; J. Dropkin; K. Spaeth; F. Smith; J. Moline;

Patient handling-related MSDs in hospital workers: analyses of 7 years Workers' Compensation claims data

Abstract

Objectives Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are the foremost occupational injury among healthcare workers. This study investigates the magnitude of patient handling-related MSDs among employees in the largest healthcare system in New York State. Methods MSDs were identified using reported ICD-9 codes from institutional Workers9 Compensation claims (2003–09). Patient handling and other potential risk factors were obtained. Only accepted and medical cost reimbursed claims were included. Robust Poisson regression was used to evaluate determinants of patient handling-related musculoskeletal claims. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated. Results Over 7 years, 14 WC claims were accepted per 100 full time equivalents (FTEs) (3452 claims/24824 FTEs). Sixty-seven percent of these claims were diagnosed as MSDs (n=2312). Patient handling-related MSDs accounted for 41% (n=940). Among patient handling-related MSDs, workers employed under 5 years at the health system had over three times more claims than workers employed over 20 years (IRR=3.1 (2.5–3.7)), while men experienced slightly higher claims than women (IRR=1.2 (1.1–1.4)), and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) had two time more claims than nurses. Union membership, shift schedule, and full-time status showed no significant relationship; some effects were shown in evening shift (IRR=1.1 (1.0–1.3) and per-diem (IRR=1.3 (1.0–1.5)). Forty two percent of injuries occurred while lifting patients and 19% occurred while holding or carrying patients. EMTs obtained 85% of MSDs from patient lifting, holding, or carrying. Lifting, holding or carrying patients explained over half of patient handling-related MSDs. Conclusions The above risk factors can be modified through proper engineering controls.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
bronze