Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Histopathologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Histopathology
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Histopathology
Article . 2022
versions View all 2 versions

Endometrial neuroendocrine carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma are distinct entities with overlap in neuroendocrine marker expression

Authors: Basile Tessier‐Cloutier; Eun‐Young Kang; Deepu Alex; Colin J R Stewart; W Glenn McCluggage; Martin Köbel; Cheng‐Han Lee;

Endometrial neuroendocrine carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma are distinct entities with overlap in neuroendocrine marker expression

Abstract

AimsDedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (DDECs)/undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDECs) frequently harbour genomic activation of switch/sucrose non‐fermentable (SWI/SNF)‐complex proteins, and can show histological overlap with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The aim of this study was to compare the extent of the expression of neuroendocrine markers, SWI/SNF proteins and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in DDEC/UDEC and NEC.Methods and resultsThe extent of expression of synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, ARID1A, ARID1B, SMARCA4, SMARCB1 and MMR proteins was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on 44 SWI/SNF‐deficient DDECs/UDECs and 15 NECs. Thirty‐three of 44 (75%) DDECs/UDECs showed expression of at least one neuroendocrine marker, with 18 of 44 (41%) expressing two or more neuroendocrine markers, whereas all 15 NECs showed expression of at least one neuroendocrine marker, with 14 of 15 (93%) expressing two or more neuroendocrine markers. Neuroendocrine marker expression in DDECs/UDECs was typically focal when present, with average extents of 17%, 4% and 8% for synaptophysin, chromogranin and CD56 in the positive cases, respectively, in contrast to 73%, 40% and 62% in the positive NEC cases, respectively. All 15 NECs showed intact expression of SWI/SNF‐complex proteins, except for one that showed isolated loss of ARID1A. Thirty‐eight of 44 DDECs/UDECs were MMR‐abnormal (34 with loss of MLH1 and PMS2, and four with loss of PMS2 alone), whereas all NECs retained MMR protein expression.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates frequent but typically focal neuroendocrine marker expression in SWI/SNF‐deficient DDECs/UDECs, whereas NECs typically express two or more neuroendocrine markers, with diffuse expression of at least one marker. ARID1B, SMARCA4 and SMARCB1 immunohistochemistry can be used to aid in the differentiation between DDEC/UDEC and NEC.

Keywords

DNA Helicases, Synaptophysin, Nuclear Proteins, Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Endometrial Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Chromogranins, Humans, Female, Carcinoma, Endometrioid, Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2, Transcription Factors

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%