Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Biochemical and Biop...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Vitronectin and collagen I differentially regulate osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells

Authors: Anup K, Kundu; Andrew J, Putnam;

Vitronectin and collagen I differentially regulate osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells

Abstract

The roles of various soluble factors in promoting the osteogenic differentiation of adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been widely studied, but little is known about how the extracellular matrix (ECM) instructs the phenotypic transition between growth and differentiation. To investigate this question, we cultured MSCs on purified vitronectin or type-I collagen, motivated by our earlier tissue engineering work demonstrating that MSC adhesion to polymer scaffolds is primarily mediated by the passive adsorption of these two ECM ligands from serum. Using alkaline phosphatase activity and matrix mineralization as indicators of the early and late stages of osteogenesis, respectively, we report here that both substrates supported differentiation, but the mechanism was substrate dependent. Specifically, osteogenesis on vitronectin correlated with enhanced focal adhesion formation, the activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and paxillin, and the diminished activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathways. By contrast, MSCs on type-I collagen exhibited reduced focal adhesion formation, reduced activation of FAK and paxillin, and increased activation of ERK and PI3K. Inhibition of ERK and FAK blocked mineral deposition on both substrates, suggesting that the observed differences in signaling pathways ultimately converge to the same cell fate. Understanding these mechanistic differences is essential to predictably control the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and widen their use in regenerative medicine.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Integrins, Osteoblasts, Tissue Engineering, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Differentiation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Collagen Type I, Extracellular Matrix, Osteogenesis, Cell Adhesion, Humans, Adsorption, Vitronectin, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    139
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
139
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%