Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Pharmacol...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions

Phenylalanine 169 in the Second Extracellular Loop of the Human Histamine H4 Receptor Is Responsible for the Difference in Agonist Binding between Human and Mouse H4 Receptors

Authors: Lim, Herman D.; Jongejan, Aldo; Bakker, Remko A.; Haaksma, Eric; De Esch, Iwan J.P.; Leurs, Rob;

Phenylalanine 169 in the Second Extracellular Loop of the Human Histamine H4 Receptor Is Responsible for the Difference in Agonist Binding between Human and Mouse H4 Receptors

Abstract

Using the natural variation in histamine H(4) receptor protein sequence, we tried to identify amino acids involved in the binding of H(4) receptor agonists. To this end, we constructed a variety of chimeric human-mouse H(4) receptor proteins to localize the domain responsible for the observed pharmacological differences between human and mouse H(4) receptors in the binding of H(4) receptor agonists, such as histamine, clozapine, and VUF 8430 [S-(2-guanidylethyl)-isothiourea]. After identification of a domain between the top of transmembrane domain 4 and the top of transmembrane domain 5 as being responsible for the differences in agonist affinity between human and mouse H(4)Rs, detailed site-directed mutagenesis studies were performed. These studies identified Phe(169) in the second extracellular loop as the single amino acid responsible for the differences in agonist affinity between the human and mouse H(4)Rs. Phe(169) is part of a Phe-Phe motif, which is also present in the recently crystallized beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. These results point to an important role of the second extracellular loop in the agonist binding to the H(4) receptor and provide a molecular explanation for the species difference between human and mouse H(4) receptors.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Indoles, Phenylalanine, Molecular Sequence Data, Piperazines, Cell Line, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice, Species Specificity, Animals, Humans, Receptors, Histamine, Amino Acid Sequence, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2, Histamine, Receptors, Histamine H4

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    51
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
51
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%