Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Genetic variant inKIAA0319, but not inDYX1C1, is associated with risk of dyslexia: An integrated meta‐analysis

Authors: Li, Zou; Wei, Chen; Shanshan, Shao; Zhao, Sun; Rong, Zhong; Junxin, Shi; Xiaoping, Miao; +1 Authors

Genetic variant inKIAA0319, but not inDYX1C1, is associated with risk of dyslexia: An integrated meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractDYX1C1 andKIAA0319have been two of the most extensively studied candidate genes for dyslexia given their important roles in the neuronal migration and neurite growth. The −3G > A inDYX1C1and the 931C > T inKIAA0319were of special interest for dyslexia but with inconsistent results. We performed a meta‐analysis integrating case–control and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) studies to clearly discern the effect of these two variants in dyslexia. Data from case–control and TDT studies were analyzed in an allelic model using the Catmap software. In overall meta‐analysis, the pooled OR for the −3A allele and the 931T allele was 0.68 (95% CI = 0.25–1.87,Pheterogeneity = 0.000) and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.78–0.98,Pheterogeneity = 0.125), respectively. The stratified analysis showed that the between‐study heterogeneity regarding the −3G > A polymorphism might be accounted by the publication year. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis of −3G > A polymorphism indicated the stability of the result. In conclusion, our results suggested that the 931C > T variant inKIAA0319, but not the −3G > A inDYX1C1, was significantly associated with the risk of dyslexia. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dyslexia, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genetic Association Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    37
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
37
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%