Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pathology Internatio...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pathology International
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Detection of M2 macrophages and colony‐stimulating factor 1 expression in serous and mucinous ovarian epithelial tumors

Authors: Kyoko, Kawamura; Yoshihiro, Komohara; Kiyomi, Takaishi; Hidetaka, Katabuchi; Motohiro, Takeya;

Detection of M2 macrophages and colony‐stimulating factor 1 expression in serous and mucinous ovarian epithelial tumors

Abstract

Tumor‐associated macrophages (TAM) are known to possess the immunosuppressive M2 macrophage phenotype. They contribute to tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis by producing various mediators. Macrophages, especially M2 polarized macrophages, preferentially express CD163 and CD204, but few studies have investigated macrophage phenotypes in human ovarian tumors. The purpose of the present study was therefore to present results on macrophage differentiation in human ovarian serous and mucinous epithelial tumors. The method focused on immunostaining of paraffin‐embedded tumor samples. Almost all macrophages infiltrating tumor tissues expressed CD163 and CD204, indicating the phenotypic shift toward M2 macrophage. The numbers of CD68‐positive macrophages as well as of CD163‐ and CD204‐positive macrophages in borderline and malignant tumors were significantly higher than in benign tumors. They correlated well with histological gradient of malignancy. Macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (also known as colony‐stimulating factor; CSF‐1), which is one of the cytokines considered to induce TAM to polarize toward an M2 phenotype, was then evaluated. CSF‐1 expression in malignant tumor cells was significantly higher than that in benign tumor cells and correlated with histological malignancy. These results suggest that CSF‐1 derived from tumor tissues induces macrophages to shift toward the M2 phenotype, which is considered to promote tumor growth.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Ovarian Neoplasms, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Macrophages, Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic, Scavenger Receptors, Class A, Cell Differentiation, Receptors, Cell Surface, Middle Aged, Cystadenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Immunohistochemistry, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, CD163 Antigen, Phenotype, Antigens, CD, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    195
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
195
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%