Powered by OpenAIRE graph
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Genome Researcharrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Genome Research
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Genome Research
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Genome Research
Article . 2001
versions View all 2 versions

How Malleable is the Eukaryotic Genome? Extreme Rate of Chromosomal Rearrangement in the GenusDrosophila

Authors: Alfredo Ruiz; José M. Ranz; Ferran Casals;

How Malleable is the Eukaryotic Genome? Extreme Rate of Chromosomal Rearrangement in the GenusDrosophila

Abstract

During the evolution of the genusDrosophila, the molecular organization of the major chromosomal elements has been repeatedly rearranged via the fixation of paracentric inversions. Little detailed information is available, however, on the extent and effect of these changes at the molecular level. In principle, a full description of the rate and pattern of change could reveal the limits, if any, to which the eukaryotic genome can accommodate reorganizations. We have constructed a high-density physical map of the largest chromosomal element inDrosophila repleta(chromosome 2) and compared the order and distances between the markers with those on the homologous chromosomal element (3R) inDrosophila melanogaster. The two species belong to different subgenera (DrosophilaandSophophora, respectively), which diverged 40–62 million years (Myr) ago and represent, thus, the farthest lineages within theDrosophilagenus. The comparison reveals extensive reshuffling of gene order from centromere to telomere. Using a maximum likelihood method, we estimate that 114 ± 14 paracentric inversions have been fixed in this chromosomal element since the divergence of the two species, that is, 0.9–1.4 inversions fixed per Myr. Comparison with available rates of chromosomal evolution, taking into account genome size, indicates that theDrosophilagenome shows the highest rate found so far in any eukaryote. Twenty-one small segments (23–599 kb) comprising at least two independent (nonoverlapping) markers appear to be conserved betweenD. melanogasterandD. repleta. These results are consistent with the random breakage model and do not provide significant evidence of functional constraint of any kind. They support the notion that theDrosophilagenome is extraordinarily malleable and has a modular organization. The high rate of chromosomal change also suggests a very limited transferability of the positional information from theDrosophilagenome to other insects.[The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank data library under accession no,AF319441.]

Related Organizations
Keywords

Gene Rearrangement, Genetic Markers, Base Composition, Genome, Molecular Sequence Data, Chromosome Mapping, Genes, Insect, Evolution, Molecular, Drosophila melanogaster, Eukaryotic Cells, Chromosome Inversion, Gene Order, Animals, Drosophila, Conserved Sequence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    156
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
156
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 1%
bronze