<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
DNA Specificity Determinants Associate with Distinct Transcription Factor Functions

DNA Specificity Determinants Associate with Distinct Transcription Factor Functions
To elucidate how genomic sequences build transcriptional control networks, we need to understand the connection between DNA sequence and transcription factor binding and function. Binding predictions based solely on consensus predictions are limited, because a single factor can use degenerate sequence motifs and because related transcription factors often prefer identical sequences. The ETS family transcription factor, ETS1, exemplifies these challenges. Unexpected, redundant occupancy of ETS1 and other ETS proteins is observed at promoters of housekeeping genes in T cells due to common sequence preferences and the presence of strong consensus motifs. However, ETS1 exhibits a specific function in T cell activation; thus, unique transcriptional targets are predicted. To uncover the sequence motifs that mediate specific functions of ETS1, a genome-wide approach, chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), identified both promoter and enhancer binding events in Jurkat T cells. A comparison with DNase I sensitivity both validated the dataset and also improved accuracy. Redundant occupancy of ETS1 with the ETS protein GABPA occurred primarily in promoters of housekeeping genes, whereas ETS1 specific occupancy occurred in the enhancers of T cell-specific genes. Two routes to ETS1 specificity were identified: an intrinsic preference of ETS1 for a variant of the ETS family consensus sequence and the presence of a composite sequence that can support cooperative binding with a RUNX transcription factor. Genome-wide occupancy of RUNX factors corroborated the importance of this partnership. Furthermore, genome-wide occupancy of co-activator CBP indicated tight co-localization with ETS1 at specific enhancers, but not redundant promoters. The distinct sequences associated with redundant versus specific ETS1 occupancy were predictive of promoter or enhancer location and the ontology of nearby genes. These findings demonstrate that diversity of DNA binding motifs may enable variable transcription factor function at different genomic sites.
- Huntsman Cancer Institute United States
- University of Pennsylvania United States
- University of Utah United States
- Brigham Young University Idaho United States
- Government of the United States of America United States
Binding Sites, Base Sequence, Genome, Human, T-Lymphocytes, Core Binding Factor alpha Subunits, QH426-470, Lymphocyte Activation, GA-Binding Protein Transcription Factor, Proto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1, Jurkat Cells, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Genetics, Humans, Gene Regulatory Networks, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Research Article, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors
Binding Sites, Base Sequence, Genome, Human, T-Lymphocytes, Core Binding Factor alpha Subunits, QH426-470, Lymphocyte Activation, GA-Binding Protein Transcription Factor, Proto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1, Jurkat Cells, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Genetics, Humans, Gene Regulatory Networks, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Research Article, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors
17 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).169 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%