Contrasting mutation rates in mitochondrial and nuclear genes of yeasts versus mammals
doi: 10.1007/bf00326232
pmid: 1657417
Contrasting mutation rates in mitochondrial and nuclear genes of yeasts versus mammals
Base substitutions have been compared in two mitochondrial and two nuclear genes from three yeasts and three mammals. In yeasts, the two mitochondrial genes, cytochrome oxidase subunit 2 (COX2) and apocytochrome b (CYB), have fewer changes on a percentage basis than the nuclear-encoded cytochrome c (CYC) gene. By contrast, in mammals, the same mitochondrial genes have more mutations than CYC on a percentage basis. Sequence comparisons of the nuclear small-subunit ribosomal RNA (nSSU) gene shows that there are more substitutions per unit length in the three yeasts than in the three mammals. This result suggests that although the yeasts are more distantly related than the mammals, their mitochondrial genes have accumulated fewer changes.
- Australian National University Australia
Cell Nucleus, Mammals, Base Sequence, Genes, Fungal, Molecular Sequence Data, Restriction Mapping, Cytochrome c Group, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mitochondria, Kluyveromyces, Open Reading Frames, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Mutation, Animals, Autoradiography, Amino Acid Sequence, DNA, Fungal, Candida
Cell Nucleus, Mammals, Base Sequence, Genes, Fungal, Molecular Sequence Data, Restriction Mapping, Cytochrome c Group, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mitochondria, Kluyveromyces, Open Reading Frames, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Mutation, Animals, Autoradiography, Amino Acid Sequence, DNA, Fungal, Candida
14 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2018IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).54 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
