Genetic Influences on the Outcome of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Genetic Influences on the Outcome of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
To determine the association of genetic variants in known age-related macular degeneration (AMD) risk-associated genes with outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in neovascular AMD.Prospective cohort study.We enrolled 224 consecutive patients with neovascular AMD at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia.Patients were treated with 3 initial monthly ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections followed by 9 months of "as required" injections based on clinician's decision at each follow-up visit according to retreatment criteria. Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in known AMD risk-associated genes including CFH (rs800292, rs3766404, rs1061170, rs2274700 and rs393955), HTRA1 (rs11200638), CFHR1-5 (rs10922153, rs16840639, rs6667243, and rs1853883), LOC387715/ARMS2 (rs3793917 and rs10490924), C3 (rs2230199 and rs1047286), C2 (rs547154), CFB (rs641153) and F13B (rs6003) were examined. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the role of each SNP in treatment outcome.The influence of selected SNPs on mean change in visual acuity (VA) at 12 months.Mean baseline VA was 51 ± 16.8 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. Overall, the mean change in VA from baseline was +3.2 ± 14.9 letters at 12 months. The AA (homozygote risk) genotype at rs11200638 - HTRA1 promoter SNP (P = 0.001) and GG (homozygote risk) genotype at rs10490924 (A69S) in LOC387715/ARMS2 (P = 0.002) were each significantly associated with poorer VA outcome at 12 months after multiple correction. Mean ± standard deviation change in VA from baseline in patients with AA genotype at rs11200638 was -2.9 ± 15.2 letters after 12 months compared with +5.1 ± 14.1 letters in patients with AG or GG genotypes at this SNP. Patients with either of these genotypes were also significantly more likely to lose >15 letters after 12 months. SNPs rs11200638 and rs10490924 were in high linkage disequilibrium (r(2) = 0.92). None of the other examined SNPs was associated with outcome.The HTRA1 promoter SNP (rs11200638) and A69S at LOC387715/ARMS2 were associated with a poorer visual outcome for ranibizumab or bevacizumab treatment in neovascular AMD, suggesting strong pharmacogenetic associations with anti-VEGF treatment. This finding could aid in applying more individualized treatment regimens based on patients' genotype to achieve optimal treatment response in AMD.The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
- University of Melbourne Australia
- Centre for Eye Research Australia Australia
- Swinburne University of Technology Australia
- The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital Australia
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Genotype, Proteins, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Complement System Proteins, High-Temperature Requirement A Serine Peptidase 1, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Bevacizumab, Cohort Studies, Pharmacogenetics, Complement Factor H, Ranibizumab, 616, Complement C3b Inactivator Proteins, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Genotype, Proteins, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Complement System Proteins, High-Temperature Requirement A Serine Peptidase 1, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Bevacizumab, Cohort Studies, Pharmacogenetics, Complement Factor H, Ranibizumab, 616, Complement C3b Inactivator Proteins, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
9 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2008IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2008IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2007IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2007IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).68 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
