In Vivo Effects of Histone H3 Depletion on Nucleosome Occupancy and Position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
In Vivo Effects of Histone H3 Depletion on Nucleosome Occupancy and Position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Previous studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae established that depletion of histone H4 results in the genome-wide transcriptional de-repression of hundreds of genes. To probe the mechanism of this transcriptional de-repression, we depleted nucleosomes in vivo by conditional repression of histone H3 transcription. We then measured the resulting changes in transcription by RNA–seq and in chromatin organization by MNase–seq. This experiment also bears on the degree to which trans-acting factors and DNA–encoded elements affect nucleosome position and occupancy in vivo. We identified ∼60,000 nucleosomes genome wide, and we classified ∼2,000 as having preferentially reduced occupancy following H3 depletion and ∼350 as being preferentially retained. We found that the in vivo influence of DNA sequences that favor or disfavor nucleosome occupancy increases following histone H3 depletion, demonstrating that nucleosome density contributes to moderating the influence of DNA sequence on nucleosome formation in vivo. To identify factors important for influencing nucleosome occupancy and position, we compared our data to 40 existing whole-genome data sets. Factors associated with promoters, such as histone acetylation and H2A.z incorporation, were enriched at sites of nucleosome loss. Nucleosome retention was linked to stabilizing marks such as H3K36me2. Notably, the chromatin remodeler Isw2 was uniquely associated with retained occupancy and altered positioning, consistent with Isw2 stabilizing histone–DNA contacts and centering nucleosomes on available DNA in vivo. RNA–seq revealed a greater number of de-repressed genes (∼2,500) than previous studies, and these genes exhibited reduced nucleosome occupancy in their promoters. In summary, we identify factors likely to influence nucleosome stability under normal growth conditions and the specific genomic locations at which they act. We find that DNA–encoded nucleosome stability and chromatin composition dictate which nucleosomes will be lost under conditions of limiting histone protein and that this, in turn, governs which genes are susceptible to a loss of regulatory fidelity.
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
- Department of Biology United States
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center United States
Adenosine Triphosphatases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Nuclear Proteins, Acetylation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, QH426-470, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Nucleosomes, DNA-Binding Proteins, Histones, Repressor Proteins, Sirtuin 2, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genetics, Genome, Fungal, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Silent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Research Article, Transcription Factors
Adenosine Triphosphatases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Nuclear Proteins, Acetylation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, QH426-470, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Nucleosomes, DNA-Binding Proteins, Histones, Repressor Proteins, Sirtuin 2, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genetics, Genome, Fungal, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Silent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Research Article, Transcription Factors
9 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2019IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2019IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2017IsRelatedTo
- 2019IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).84 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
