The Ames test is widely used in the mutagenicity evaluation of new and existing chemicals as a part of a compound selection strategy, regulatory control, the equivalence assessment, carcinogenic potential measurement etc. Intensification of the chemical industry and synthesis of plenty of new molecules has led to the necessity of tests with a higher throughput capacity. The 6-well miniaturized bacterial reverse mutation test and the standard Ames test were compared using 14 technical grade active ingredients (TGAIs) of pesticides. With some exceptions, the responses obtained in the miniscreen Ames are similar to those seen in the standard method: 4 overall test outcomes were negative and 9 were positive in both test versions, but 1 discordant result between the miniscreen and standard version. Comparison of the standard and the miniscreen Ames test resulted in 98% of concordance across five strains and conditions (±S9). The overall judgment is that the miniscreen Ames test can be used to assess the mutagenicity of pesticide analogs. It has the advantage of decreasing the number of materials and animals (for S9) and keeping a high-test performance.