Dicing of viral replication intermediates during silencing of latent Drosophila viruses
Dicing of viral replication intermediates during silencing of latent Drosophila viruses
Previous studies revealed roles for RNA interference (RNAi) in the immediate cellular response to viral infection in plants, nematodes and flies. However, little is known about how RNAi combats viruses during persistent or latent infections. Our analysis of small RNAs cloned from Drosophila cells latently infected with Flock House Virus (FHV) failed to reveal signatures of bulk degradation of the viral genome. Instead, this + strand virus specifically generated Dicer-2-dependent, 21-nucleotide siRNAs that derived in equal proportion from + and − strands. Curiously, luciferase reporters that are fully complementary to abundant viral siRNAs were poorly repressed. Moreover, although the viral siRNAs that were incorporated into an effector complex associated with Argonaute2, bulk FHV siRNAs in latently infected cells were not loaded into any Argonaute protein. Together, these data suggest that direct dicing of viral replication intermediates plays an important role in maintaining the latent viral state. In addition, the denial of bulk viral siRNAs from effector complexes suggests that criteria beyond the structural competency of RNA duplexes influence the assembly of functional silencing complexes.
- Kettering University United States
Ribonuclease III, Virus Replication, Cell Line, Virus Latency, Argonaute Proteins, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, RNA-Induced Silencing Complex, Drosophila, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, RNA Helicases
Ribonuclease III, Virus Replication, Cell Line, Virus Latency, Argonaute Proteins, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, RNA-Induced Silencing Complex, Drosophila, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, RNA Helicases
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).92 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
